![]() ![]() Despite protests from domestic inventors and arms manufacturers-two designers, Russell and Livermore, even sued the U.S. The trials were held at Governors Island, New York. A competition was held in 1892, comparing rifle designs from Lee, Krag–Jørgensen, Mannlicher, Mauser, Schmidt–Rubin, and about 40 other military and civilian designs. Army searched for a new rifle in the early 1890s to replace their old Springfield Model 1873 "trapdoor" single-shot rifles. Soldiers practice a bayonet stab with their Krag rifles. Krag was replaced beginning in 1903 with the introduction of the M1903 Springfield rifle, which was essentially a copy of a Mauser, although some design elements of the Krag remained, such as the cocking piece.Īmerican Krags are the most plentiful and affordable of all three Krag variants, although many are sporterized, and they remain popular with collectors today. All versions and variants were manufactured under license by the Springfield Armory between 18 and famously served as the longarm during the Spanish–American War.Īlthough "Krags" were popular, unique and efficient, the side loading gate mechanism was slow and cumbersome to reload in combat compared to the clip loaded Spanish Mausers the Krag was up against. The Springfield Model 1892–99 Krag–Jørgensen rifle is a Norwegian-designed bolt-action rifle that was adopted in 1892 as the standard United States Army military longarm, chambered for U.S. 30-40 round (at bottom), as compared to its predecessor, a Springfield Model 1888 rifle with. Sometimes a "bean counter" (or a Congressman) would ask how many "Model X" were made and the armory folks scrambled to find an answer (not THE answer, just AN answer) and different people would provide different answers.Receiver, loading door, and bolt assembly of a US M1898 Krag–Jørgensen Rifle with. When production of a given model stopped, no one really cared when or at what number. Further, the whole effort of the armory was concentrated on tooling up to produce the new rifle, not in worrying about past work. ![]() so, as long as a serial number was not duplicated, it was of little concern. To the military armories, serial numbers were seen primarily a means of inventory control by the using unit, not for production control or inventory at the production facility. The military armories (and civilian factories as well) did not have any great concern for serial numbers in the days before "gun control" laws. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |